Daily Archives: November 15, 2010

CIOs must revaluate use of outsourcing: Gartner

 

by Lisa Banks, computerworld.com

CIOs must revaluate their use of outsourcing and move from the role of IT manager to broker if effective resourcing is to take place, a Gartner analyst has warned.

In Sydney for the Gartner Symposium, analyst Linda Cohen spoke to CIO Australia and said the idea that outsourcing is a problem solver is not always the case.

“We ask our CIO clients to consider outsourcing as an operating strategy rather than a problem solver,” she said. “Historically, outsourcing has been a bandaid and a way to fix the problem.”

Cohen said another misconception CIOs may have about outsourcing is that it will save the business money over a period of time.

“The number one reason they choose to outsource is this theory that they can lower their costs… honestly, history tells us the act of outsourcing doesn’t save money,” Cohen said. “The real problem is how do you sustain the lower cost to operate?”

Developing a clear strategy around not only IT requirements but business requirements is an important CIO consideration, according to Cohen.

“The number one thing they have to do is bother to align, literally,” she said. “First of all bother to have a strategy, bother to sit down with the business operators…and plan for the way you will resource moving forward IT that that business needs.”

With recent suggestions that outsourcing problems are being caused by middle management, Cohen said a shift in strategy around outsourcing will see the role of the CIO change slightly.

“The CIOs new role is to go and find the new technology for the business,” she said. “The supplier of IT to the business, not the manager of IT to the business.”

Cohen’s top tips for CIOs looking to outsource included:

Take control of your outsourced technology

“We’re telling our CIO clients that its really time to take control of sourcing as a strategic endeavour,” she said. “We are not going back to a time where we did everything inside, so the CIOs have to become more savvy for standing for and utilising an outsourcing strategy.”

Avoid ‘old fashioned’ SLAs

“The old fashioned structure of these deals created service level agreements that were all about the underlying technology and how it operates,” she said. “That’s the real problem here, we lock ourselves into historic technology architectures.”

Avoid vendor lock-in

“The new method of service delivery is like a utility style service,” Cohen said. “The way the vendor operates creates the capability is their factory, their way, in their preferred location.”

Did you like this? Share it:

South America seen to give local outsourcing a run for its money

 

BY BEN ARNOLD O. DE VERA REPORTER, manilatimes.net

EMERGING offshore destinations in South America would give the Philippine information technology-business process outsourcing (IT-BPO) industry tough competition next year amid a rosier global outlook, a research and advisory firm said. Canada-based XMG Global Inc. said global outsourcing contracts next year would total $17 billion, 42-percent higher than the about $12-billion worth of deals expected to be sealed this year.

“Given the bright forecast on the global economy, more outsourcing deals and negotiations will be closed next year,” said Lauro Vives, XMG chief analyst, adding that “majority of these contracts are smaller deals and have shorter contract durations.”

Vives said South American countries such as Brazil and Mexico—which
are nearer to the US—would likely get a bigger share of the outsourcing business.

The US remains the biggest IT-BPO market, and is the Philippines’ top source of clients.

“These up-and-coming alternative outsourcing destinations have the potential to have respectable shares in the global market. Latin American countries will collectively post $8-billion total revenue this year which is expected to grow by 19 to 23 percent in 2011,” Vives said.

“The distribution of outsourcing investments to different locations is merely a reflection of the new normalcy defined by improved business outlook and maturity of countries to deliver off-shoring services,” he said.

Traditional BPO destinations like India, China, Vietnam and the Philippines should be extended greater government support to advance their outsourcing capability and extract larger market share, the XMG analyst said.

Under the IT-BPO Road Map 2011-2016, the Philippine BPO sector aims to triple its revenues and employment to $25 billion and 1.3 million, respectively, in six years’ time.

The industry hopes to contribute nine percent of the country’s gross domestic product and corner a tenth of the global outsourcing pie by 2016.

Local BPO executives had said these targets would be achieved if the sector enjoys more government assistance in terms of funding for promotions as well as manpower training.

Did you like this? Share it:

Offshore outsourcing: Location, location, location – who cares any more?

 

By Rod Newing, ft.com

 

Consultants believe they have a key role to play in helping governments – and the UK coalition in particular – achieve the spending cuts they are seeking, and a critical element of this will be to help them overcome concerns about offshore outsourcing.

Offshore outsourcing is relatively mature in the commercial sector, but has so far made only limited inroads into the public sector. But now the public sector is facing the need for the kind of service improvements, efficiencies and cost reductions that offshore outsourcing already delivers so well to the commercial sector.

However, offshore outsourcing is a sensitive political issue. No government wants to be accused of exporting jobs – and they need the taxes and economic activity generated by domestic employment.

“In the US, for example, the sentiment has been very anti offshoring,” says Mark Kobayashi-Hillary, an author, blogger and adviser on globalisation. “The general public has reacted quite strongly and supported any politicians who have said that they will ban any work going offshore.”

Nevertheless, offshore outsourcing is used extensively in the US commercial sector, especially in healthcare and financial services. Mr Kobayashi-Hillary points out that the Australian government sends work to India and the Philippines and the Canadian government has started offshore outsourcing, too. The UK government has no direct offshore outsourcing contracts, but parts of wider contracts are delivered from offshore locations.

NHS Shared Business Services, jointly owned by Steria and the UK Department for Health, carries out finance and accounting. Front office services are performed locally, but much administration and data entry is performed by staff in India. “Government money is paying for people to be working in another country,” says Mr Kobayashi-Hillary, “but, as Steria becomes more efficient and innovative, hard cash is actually returned to the National Health Service.”

The Pensions Authority has a contract with Tata Consultancy Services, under which front office administration is local, but some of the underlying technology is located in India. “The UK government has been more relaxed,” Mr Kobayashi-Hillary says. “Tata was quite open that the contract would be delivered from multiple locations. The government has also been offshoring application development, application management and non-core administrative processes, like data entry and image capture and transfer.”

The offshore delivery model is expanding into new territories for delivery to new geographical markets. John O’Brien, research director for business process outsourcing at TechMarketView, an analyst and research firm, highlights expansion in South America to serve Spanish speaking countries around the world.

Similarly eastern Europe is expanding, as countries such as Romania have a multi-lingual capability, skilled and knowledgeable people with very good degrees and lower wages than western Europe. The Nordic counties have taken to offshoring and France has been using nearshore services from Morocco.

Jonathan Cooper-Bagnall, head of sourcing consulting at PA Consulting Group, says the real question is not where to outsource but whether to outsource at all. “It isn’t a case of offshore, near-shore or local,” he says. “Only once you have determined that outsourcing is right for your business should you look at components like location.”

He says that offshore outsourcing is not a big issue, but organisations rarely understand all the factors that must be considered. These include labour costs, inflation, time zones, data security, political stability, labour availability, language skills, local infrastructure and legislation.

One of the biggest issues in offshore outsourcing is not jobs, but data. Organisations must clearly differentiate between information that legislation prevents crossig borders and that which can be sent to an offshore facility.

“Offshore outsourcing is no longer about labour arbitrage,” says Manish Vinayak Soman, best-shore leader for Hewlett-Packard in Europe, Middle East and Africa, “but finding out what skills you need in different countries and using offshoring as one component of a global delivery model. On-site, onshore, near-shore and offshore resources should be integrated into a balanced global delivery strategy. The process should be capability driven, rather than cost-driven.”

James Cockroft, associate director at Xantus Consulting suggests that transactional services, such as application development, service desk or call centre support, lend themselves to offshoring. In contrast, more strategic activities, where there is a greater need for bigger picture decision-making, or where transactional or cultural ambiguities may exist, should be retained in the home country.

Anthony Golledge, head of technical consulting at Detica, agrees that concerns over offshore outshoring are a red herring. Governments will need the expertise and resources of global operators to achieve the efficiencies they need.

Another reason why offshoring will cease to become such an issue is the increasing use of cloud computing, in which functionality is provided as a service over the internet. Mr Soman says that as long as the service is delivered as expected, people will be less worried about the location from which it is delivered, and will stop talking about offshoring.

“Government departments face a real dichotomy between meeting the savings and budget cuts from the spending review and keeping local jobs,” says Mr Cockroft. “Something will have to give and it will almost certainly be jobs. It is an appetite that leaves a sour taste in the mouth.”

Did you like this? Share it:

Apple Contributing to Open Source Mac Java Project

By Dan Moren

Java enthusiasts can relax a little bit: on Friday, Apple announced that it will work with Oracle to help create an open source Java SE 7 implementation for Mac OS X.

That would seem to be a 180-degree turn from last month’s news that Apple was deprecating the runtime of Java included in the company’s operating system.  Apple will be contributing a host of technological components to the open source project, Open JDK  for Mac OS X, including both 32- and 64-bit Java virtual machines, class libraries, a networking stack, and the underpinnings of a new graphical client. In addition, Apple said that the current Java SE 6 implementation will continue to be available in both Snow Leopard and the upcoming Mac OS X Lion, due out next year.

The move makes sense for Apple, as it means it can hand over the Java technology it’s been using for years–lock, stock, and barrel–to the open source community. And it means that Apple no longer has responsibility for Java.

Indeed, Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering, Bertrand Serlet, said in the statement announcing the project, “The best way for our users to always have the most up to date and secure version of Java will be to get it directly from Oracle.”

Astute observers will notice that the phrasing of that statement echoes another recent Apple announcement, this one regarding Adobe’s Flash technology. Eyebrows were raised last month when it was discovered that Apple’s new MacBook Air shipped without Adobe’s Flash Player Web plug-in installed by default. When quizzed on the topic, Apple spokesperson Bill Evans told Daring Fireball’s John Gruber:

We’re happy to continue to support Flash on the Mac, and the best way for users to always have the most up to date and secure version is to download it directly from Adobe. [emphasis added]

That’s far too close to be coincidence. Certainly, Java and Flash have some commonalities, in that they’re both cross-platform technologies, but the more important factor here is that they’re software that’s created and maintained by companies that aren’t Apple. Some might be quick to chalk this up to Apple playing its usual game of  ”my way or the highway,” but it’s important to note that Apple’s not forbidding either Java or Flash from running on OS X–it’s just absolving itself of responsibility for including–and more importantly updating–those software packages in the OS itself.

It’s not hard to see why, either. Both Flash and Java are common vectors for security exploits–the recent 10.6.5 update  patched more than 50 vulnerabilities related to Flash. And Apple has been dinged in the past for lagging behind on rolling out Java updates. Apple seems to be hoping that it’s progressing to a point where Flash and Java aren’t critical technologies for most Mac users–and that users who do need those technologies will be more than capable of downloading and installing them themselves.

Like many of Apple’s moves, this is certainly about control, but it’s also about resources. Putting the responsbility for Flash and Java onto Adobe and Oracle means two fewer external dependencies for Apple to spend its time worrying about.

Did you like this? Share it:

China and Japan are the future for Indian IT

By financialexpress

Japan has for long been a frontier that the Indian technology industry has yet to conquer. We have left our mark on the world IT map catering principally to the software outsourcing needs of major clients in the USA, Europe and, recently, Australia. These are all, by and large, English speaking or, at least zones where English for business is very acceptable. India’s twin decades of software development experience has empowered its IT industry to become the number one software outsourcing destination in the world.

But, going forward, the Indian IT industry will have to look beyond its comfort zone. That process has begun, albeit tentatively. I speak of Japan and China. The latter is a nation with which we have begun engaging more actively. This engagement, however, is limited to services for export rather than penetration of the national market.

Japan continues to be the second largest IT market in the world after the US. This market has its own unique sets of rules and manners of engagement that are often radically dissimilar to our comfort zone.

Today, for India, Japan constitutes less than 2% of the IT services exports. Penetrating the second biggest IT services market in the world continues to be a challenge for Indian IT companies—both, culturally as well as in terms of creating a sound Japan centric policy to penetrate the Japanese market successfully.

Further, as the Japanese IT industry opens its doors to long term investors, there will be greater opportunities for the Indian IT industry. The important aspect is for software outsourcing companies to aim for long term investment sans immediate returns expectation in order to benefit. The obvious challenge that companies/corporates face is that of the language barrier. Japanese businesses prefer to conduct their work in Japanese, rather than English. To overcome this impediment we would need to look at allocating more resources to train its workers on Japanese language and culture.

Indian companies looking to de-risk themselves from dependence on a single market have long tried to establish themselves in this market, but with nominal success. With its large technically qualified manpower base and IT service delivery expertise, India definitely has a big role to play as the aging Japanese economy makes choices to stay competitive in global markets.

As per Nasscom’s Japan reports, a key element for Japan to retain its competitiveness in the global market is that it would need the proactive effort by Japanese government and industry to break the traditional models and they would have to reach out.

From the Indian side, Nasscom’s president, Som Mittal, has said in the past, “With (a) shortage of technical skills in Japan, and urgent need for business transformation, Japan would be a large market. While Indian companies have been targeting this market, a new concerted approach needs to be taken by both sides.”

During and post recession, the Japanese companies are leaving no stone unturned in their pursuit to pare costs. If this is not an opportunity to penetrate this $108-billion IT services market, I do not know what would be. Troubled auto-makers Toyota and Nissan are putting out outsourcing deals worth $100-$200 million; Japanese electronics majors are re-looking at existing contracts as they seek for more cost-effective ways to maintain and support their global IT systems. Opportunities are there for the taking…

However, for our Indian companies to score a home run in this new, promising scenario, they would need to convince the Japanese to look at changing options in their choice of outsourcing destinations. Only then may we begin to see a shift from China and Korea towards India. If a Japanese company sees better service at a lower cost then you will find cooperation. The good news is that, once three or four companies see value and commit, then the foot in the door pretty soon forces it ajar. Japanese business networking is among the best in the world and success is often sought to be emulated through an element of basic copying.

The China connection

Today, Japan outsources the majority of IT development to China’s software industry. Despite an element of historical animosity dating back to the second World War and which is always remembered in China, the fact is that these two nation states are geographically and culturally closer to each other. Many Chinese software professionals know Japanese (language) and this has helped them immeasurably. Finally, once you have built trust with the Japanese, you are generally there to stay.

In light of such connectivity, the Indian technology industry would do well to look at China very seriously and in a holistic manner. That country today offers a lucrative market for Indian software development companies, their government is now more focused on developing their IT industry having declared 21 regions in China as tax-free up to 2014 to boost its offshore IT industry.

We aren’t entirely blind to this. Wipro already operates a global IT delivery centre in China. Other players among the big 6 have a presence there from ‘large to could do better’.

Basically, you ignore these two economies at your peril. Not only do they offer bright opportunities in the coming years, the fact is that the traditional lucrative western markets are beginning to head rather rapidly in the general direction of a plateau.

Speed is of the essence here—the early bird catches the worm. Further, emerging IT economies like Vietnam and Thailand are not sitting idle. This is their immediate sphere. Leave this wide open and their bite will be deep enough to keep us out for good. The time is now.

Did you like this? Share it: